A number of factors have contributed to a positive outlook for small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) growth, both in the US and internationally. A recovering economy, improved credit availability, increasing internet speeds, the affordability of cloud technology and the resulting accessibility of financial process automation have all played a part in creating an exciting new chapter for growing businesses. SMEs are finding new doors open to them in terms of technological advancements that were once considered the exclusive domain of big corporate players.
The rapid proliferation of cloud service providers and the associated cost savings of cloud communications technologies allows SMEs to harness the power of financial automation technology to drive up productivity, lower costs and increase cash flow. But according to our recent report on Automating P2P for SMEs, a majority of the sector does not recognize the accessibility or advantage of these solutions; see Figure 1.
Before they can capitalize on working capital management tools and turn AP into a revenue generator, the majority of SMEs must reign in the tedious front end processes that wreak so much havoc. SME survey respondents reported that one of their greatest AP pains—and causes for lost revenue—is the manual routing of invoices. Their other leading pains are also closely related to manual processing; see Figure 2.
CHANGING PERCEPTIONS, ONE SME AT A TIME
It’s clear that SMEs continue to suffer from a low level of P2P automation that results in troublesome processing pains that not only lead to clunky, expensive invoice routing methods, but lost revenue. What’s holding them back from implementation of one of a multitude of products on the market?
Perhaps not surprisingly, the number one obstacle to automation cited by our survey respondents was ‘internal change management;’ see Figure 3. SMEs have long been excluded from the finance process automation market, and a perceived sense that these solutions are exorbitant and irrelevant to them no doubt continues. The prevailing sentiment is that because there are so many components involved in the P2P process, automating all or part of it requires a complex, highly customized software platform installation, along with vast IT resources to support it. This has been a common misconception among the SMEs we’ve surveyed and benchmarked.
However, PayStream’s analysts have found that quite the opposite is true in many cases. Many of today’s solutions are vendor hosted (SaaS) and operate in a cloud environment, which means they are modular and can be leveraged with other software and existing ERPs. This allows for greater scalability and control in diverse business environments. And since the business models of most SMEs are naturally positioned to work well with even the smallest amount of process automation, they can often realize a shorter time to ROI.
For more insight into current trends as well as profiles of several solution providers, download the full report, Automating P2P for SMEs.
- 6 Reasons for Implementing an Expense Management System
- How Expense Automation Can Increase Manufacturers’ Profit Margins
- Reducing Employee Expense Fraud – Strategies and Tools for HR Leaders
- Capturing and Optimizing Your True Corporate Travel Program Spend Using Total Cost of Ownership
- Specialist Expense Vendors vs. ERP Suite Modules: Pros and Cons
We love you guys! Everything is going great.
Wow! This Chrome River is great. Word has spread [in our firm] and people that were not invited to be in the pilot group rollout have asked to be included!