Big data continues to be a big deal, but the results are often a big disaster. In fact, Forbes contributor Bernard Marr predicts that a full 50 percent of all big data projects are destined to fall substantially short of expectations. He says the underlying cause is always lack of proper planning, and it rears its ugly head in five different ways.
- Lack of Clear Business Objectives
People are quick to hop on the big data bandwagon, but they hop on asking the wrong question. They’re busy asking “how” instead of asking “why.” They thus dive into the project headfirst, without any inkling of the problem they’re trying to solve. A prime case in point came from a business that dug deep into data, finding that a particular bottle of wine sold best on a Tuesday, especially when it was raining. Interesting, but not much help for enhancing growth or promoting overall positive change.
- Lack of a Solid Business Case
In addition to having a problem or issue that needs solving, big data works best if you have a solid reason why you’re business is investing in it. The process is neither fast nor cheap, requiring a notable investment to gather, analyze and securely store the mounds of data.
- Management Mishaps
Management can fail on multiple levels, especially since top-notch data scientists typically demand at least $100,000 per year. Management can fail to properly calculate a long-term or ongoing project cost, management can fail to engage in productive discussions with the data scientists, and management can fail by not trusting the algorithms over their gut instincts.
- Shoddy Communication
The two main communicators typically have vastly different mindsets. The CEO is thinking profits and targets while the data scientist is entrenched in analytics and experiments. The two aren’t naturally aligned for optimum communication, and important information can get lost in translation.
- Missing the Right Skills at the Right Time
Trained data scientists are expensive and in high demand. Companies that do have access to them often waste the scientists’ time with poorly planned projects, only to find the scientists are unavailable when a well-thought-out project comes down the pike. The result? Yet another project crashes and burns, due to lack of proper planning.
Keep your own spending data on track with Chrome River Analytics.
- A Case Study: CSG International Saves 20–40 Hours Per Month After Switching Over
- The Future of Travel Part 2: Five Predictions for Post-Covid Business Travel And Expense Management
- The Future of Travel Part 1: Five Findings That Prove Business Travel is Here to Stay
- Elsevier: Overcoming Global Finance Complexities
- Why Mobility is a Critical Consideration for Your Expense Management Strategy
Our choice of Chrome River EXPENSE was made in part due to the very user-friendly interface, easy configurability, and the clear commitment to impactful customer service – all aspects in which Chrome River was the clear winner. While Chrome River is not as large as some of the other vendors we considered, we found that to be a benefit and our due diligence showed that it could support us as well as any large players in the space, along with a personalized level of customer care.
We are excited to be able to enforce much more stringent compliance to our expense guidelines and significantly enhance our expense reporting and analytics. By automating these processes, we will be able to free up AP time formerly spent on manual administrative tasks, and enhance the role by being much more strategic.